Multiplan Corporation F/K/A Churchill Capital Corp. Iii Loss Information Form

See If You Qualify For Monetary Reward

Levi & Korsinsky, LLP does not share your information with others. There is no cost or obligation for you to submit.

Submit Transaction Detail Now (Optional)

- OR -

    An attorney-client relationship is not created with the submission of this form, nor an obligation on the part of Levi & Korsinsky or you to file a lead plaintiff motion in this matter . The information you submit is held as confidential. If, in its sole discretion, Levi & Korsinsky believes that you might be an appropriate lead plaintiff candidate, Levi & Korsinsky will contact you to discuss the matter and whether to establish an attorney client relationship. By submitting this form, you are authorizing us to contact you regarding this case and/or future cases. Additionally, by submitting this form, you agree to receive an email providing you with login details for CORE (Compensation Recovery Monitoring System) to help you monitor and track your securities. This is a complimentary service. Thank you for submitting your details to Levi & Korsinsky.

    FAX: 212-363-7171

    Levi & Korsinsky, LLP announces that a MPLN class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of investors who purchased Multiplan Corporation F/K/A Churchill Capital Corp. Iii (MPLN) securities between July 12, 2020 and November 10, 2020. For more on the MPLN Lawsuit please contact us today.

    According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (a) MultiPlan was losing tens of millions of dollars in sales and revenues to Naviguard, a competitor created by one of MultiPlan’s largest customers, UnitedHealthcare, which threatened up to 35% of the Company’s sales and 80% of its levered cash flows by 2022; (b) sales and revenue declines in the quarters leading up to the Merger were not due to “idiosyncratic” customer behaviors as represented, but rather due to a fundamental deterioration in demand for MultiPlan’s services and increased competition, as payors developed competing services and sought alternatives to eliminating excessive healthcare costs; (c) MultiPlan was facing significant pricing pressures for its services and had been forced to materially reduce its take rate in the lead up to the Merger by insurers, who had expressed dissatisfaction with the price and quality of MultiPlan’s services and balanced billing practices, causing the Company’s to cut its take rate by up to half in some cases; (d) as a result of (a)-(c) above, MultiPlan was set to continue to suffer from revenues and earnings declines, increased competition and deteriorating pricing dynamics following the Merger; (e) as a result of (a)-(d) above, MultiPlan was forced to seek continued revenue growth and to improve its competitive positioning through pricey acquisitions, including through the purchase of HST for $140 million at a premium price from a former MultiPlan executive only one month after the Merger; and (f) as a result of (a)-(e) above, Churchill III investors had grossly overpaid for the acquisition of MultiPlan in the Merger, and MultiPlan’s business was worth far less than represented to investors.

    If you suffered a loss in you have until June 7, 2021 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as a lead plaintiff.